Luckily, I found an easy solution to it. You can simply do: As long as the parent value is correctly calculated, we can reuse that value. Stack Overflow for Teams is a private, secure spot for you and your coworkers to find and share information. As you can see the thread spends But to the rescue, I also found out that instrumentation profiling works in virtual machines. Jusy thinking about calculating a new value based on a chain of callers, traversing up and down the tree made me dizzy.
| Uploader: | Tojakus |
| Date Added: | 6 September 2013 |
| File Size: | 69.17 Mb |
| Operating Systems: | Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X |
| Downloads: | 40904 |
| Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |
Below is the the new view using the same data file as above. Unfortunately, we have run into a limitation here.
Analyzing profiling data from vsperfcmd
The parsing was pretty straight forward, and I thought that a TreeView would be suitable for representing the call stacks. When ran a sampling profiling at work under vs, my viewer failed to read the file.
The problem is that it is not enough to just look at the contribution from the Vspperfcmd, but also from the Caller's caller, and in its extension also the caller's caller's caller. In a future it would be nice to add them also to the viewer. As long as the parent value is correctly calculated, we can reuse that value.
visual studio - Using instead of - Stack Overflow
If you have the premium or ultimate version of Visual Studio, you will have a nice Viewer and Analyzer builtin, but for the rest of us, although we have also the profiling tools available, we don't have a viewer, and profiling without a decent viewer doesn't make much sense.
The Vsperfreport tool that we use to generate the report, doesn't contain that information. My contribution is adding basic analysis to make viewing more interesting, and adding support for trace profiling data. I develop on a Mac, running Windows in a virtual environment. The summary report from a trace vspedfcmd almost identical to a report from sample profiling.
The profiling data gets generated in my locale using comma as the decimal separator. On the second level, the parent root node is correct.
Unable to do performance testing on unmanaged C++ EXE
Sign up using Email and Password. These new binaries are much much slower than the original. Then I calculated vsperfcmv new value and adjusted it based on the parent value in the TreeView.
Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. That is why the vsperfcd WaitForMultipleObjects is overrepresented. The callee ExpensiveMethodB is also a root note.
Subscribe to RSS
Any ideas how to get xee desired behavior? The data format is quite simple. All nodes that don't have any Callers ought to be entrypoints, i.
The app was developed and tested under vs If you have the professional version of VS, except for the automatic conversion, you will have to manually re-link the references to the latest version of FSharp. To make the viewer more useful, I would like to see wmainCRTStartup as the root node, and see wmain under it.
Stack Overflow for Teams is a private, secure spot for you and your coworkers to find and share information. The disadvantage is that the raw profiling data files, very fast become enormous gigs of data. My first approach was too naive. It produces new binaries with trace enabled. Post as a guest Name. What is more annoying is that wmain is appearing several times.
Active 8 months ago. This project was built with VS Unicorn Meta Zoo 9: The reason was that Vs has added some extra columns, e. I used the information available in the Root node.
Comments
Post a Comment